• 社會篇:促賭內閣的「和解共生」



  連續數日,新聞大篇幅報導,行政院長謝長廷有意開放金門離島設立賭場,並聲稱已與總統商討此事。澎湖政客馬上表態爭取跟進。一時之間,行政首長與立委諸公互相唱和,藍、綠政客異口同聲,相親相愛,謝院長果真是「和解共生」的高手,ROC也已不須「正名制憲」,「賭博共和國」(Republic of Casino)儼然即將誕生!










九四、五、二三 于尊悔樓



Beware of the 'Republic of Casino'

`Where there is gambling, there is black-gold politics, and it will be the root cause of suffering among innocent bystanders.'

By Shih Chao-hwei 釋昭慧

Thursday, May 26, 2005,Taipei Times Page 8


The media has been full of news about Premier Frank Hsieh's (謝長廷) intention to allow casinos on Kinmen, an idea he has apparently discussed with President Chen

Shui-bian (陳水扁). The news has politicians on Penghu champing at the bit to get a slice of the pie. From the chorus of approval rising from both sides of the

political spectrum in the legislature, it does appear that Hsieh has worked wonders at achieving harmony in local politics. In one fell swoop he removed the necessity

of rectifying the name of Taiwan, as a new ROC has just been born: the "Republic of Casino."

Hsieh has made it clear that, if the residents of Kinmen agree to the proposal and the appropriate legislation is passed, the government would lend its help. Clearly

the government does not intend to obstruct the idea.


There is very little sense in all of this. To make matters worse, the premier even seems to want to involve the Democratic Progressive Party in this dodgy affair by

calling on the party caucus to hold an open vote on the proposal among its legislators. His reasoning appears to be that he should create the impression that the

central government is merely bowing to the wishes of the legislators, and that it should not prevaricate in carrying out the legislators' orders.

If the caucus doesn't want to risk its reputation by being seen as a supporter of gambling, it can evade responsibility by holding a secret ballot on the issue, so

that legislators can freely express their individual preferences. Politicians can reap huge benefits by lifting the gambling ban, while the government and governing

party avoids the ignominy of being branded as pro-gambling.


But have the premier and his Cabinet consulted affected parties on both sides of this contentious issue, or initiated a public debate about it? Have they seriously

addressed the concrete reasons or reams of evidence against the establishment of casinos? Have they made the public aware of the numerous authoritative studies

containing persuasive arguments against the motion they are proposing? No, they have not. Not in any way, shape or form.

We are totally opposed to lifting the ban on gambling on Kinmen and Penghu, either in accordance with the wishes of the local government or through an anonymous vote

in the legislature. We are against the very idea of allowing casinos to open in certain appointed regions, even if the residents of the area favor the proposal.

If the Cabinet doesn't want to be seen as pro-gambling, it should allow people both for and against gambling to make their voices heard and submit the issue to media

debate. The public will then be able to make a decision based on information about the possible consequences of lifting the ban on gambling, and a referendum can be

held. The reasons for this are as follow:

First, the residents of the islands would be more likely to indulge in gambling if they have a casino on their doorstep, and they are likely to gamble themselves out

of house and home and ruin their families and reputations. Therefore, even if casinos are only opened in a specific district, it will still lead to public security

concerns, create a public nuisance and have an impact on politics, the economy, education and culture. This will exert a far-reaching influence on the public at large.

Where there is gambling, there is black-gold politics, and it will be the root cause of suffering among innocent bystanders. Since the decision would have far-reaching

consequences, it should be placed before the general public in a referendum.


Second, if gambling in Penghu and Kinmen were to be approved in a referendum, Matsu, Lanyu and other outlying islands will likely follow suit. There will be a domino

effect, eventually bringing legalized gambling from the outlying islands to the main island, making Taiwan a full-fledged "Republic of Casino."

Third, research conducted by the University of Illinois in the US found that for each US$1 the government earns from taxes on gambling, it has to fork out US$3 in

social welfare benefits. Legalizing gambling on outlying islands is not the way to develop the economy. Politicians advocating the legalization of gambling should not

cheat the public with talk of NT$70 billion in tax revenue. Instead, they should honestly explain why the public should pay NT$210 billion for social welfare in

exchange for NT$70 billion in tax revenue.


Politicians from the pan-blue and pan-green camps are at odds with each other on almost every issue. But both camps are in favor of the legalization of gambling. If

this is what is meant by "symbiosis," then it is a matter of both camps living in parasitic symbiosis with tremendously inappropriate benefits. It will corrupt the

souls of gamblers and break their families.


It is truly disheartening to see that while inter-party strife has eased, Hsieh's philosophy of reconciliation and symbiosis has turned into reconciliation with the

underworld and living in symbiosis with sin. The promptness with which our politicians have sunk into immorality is lamentable indeed.

Shih Chao-hwei is the director of the Applied Ethics Research Center at Hsuan Chuang University and founder of the Anti-Gambling Legalization Alliance.


Translated by Paul Cooper and Ya-ti Lin


——刊於九十四年五月二十六日《Taipei Times》


回上一頁 回頂端
©Copyright 2021 Hongshi Buddhist Cultural and Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.